Climate change is a Hoax and part of the satan inspired UN Agenda 2030

For decades, we’ve been told that the Earth is on the brink of catastrophe due to human-caused climate change. We’ve been inundated with images of melting ice caps, rising sea levels, and extreme weather events all supposedly accelerated by human activities. But what if I told you that this entire narrative is a carefully constructed hoax designed by powerful global elites to manipulate humanity toward their ultimate goal of total control? Welcome to the truth about the climate change deception opening your eyes to the reality that Climate change is a Hoax.

The claim of a “Climate Crisis” is the most elaborate, insidious, and Satan-inspired fraud ever perpetrated on humanity. This narrative, meticulously crafted by a global cabal of technocrats, billionaires, and international bodies like the United Nations, is the central pillar of the Agenda 2030 blueprint for establishing a totalitarian New World Order. It is not about saving the planet; it is about seizing absolute and permanent control over all land, all resources, and every living human being.

Executive Summary: The Architecture of Deception

This report constitutes an exhaustive, forensic investigation into the geopolitical, scientific, and industrial constructs that underpin the narrative of anthropogenic global warming. While presented to the global public as an urgent environmental crisis threatening the habitability of the planet, a rigorous analysis of empirical data, historical documentation, and financial flows reveals a starkly different reality. The “Climate Crisis” is not a phenomenon of nature, but a fabricated narrative – a hoax – engineered by a specific cadre of globalist elites to facilitate the implementation of the United Nations Agenda 2030.

The objective of this agenda, as outlined in its own foundational documents and the writings of its architects, is the complete erosion of national sovereignty and individual self-determination. It seeks to establish a centralized, technocratic governance structure capable of inventorying and controlling all planetary resources – land, water, energy, food and human life itself. This report demonstrates that the “climate emergency” serves as the primary psychological and political mechanism to justify this seizure of power.

Drawing on the testimony of distinguished atmospheric physicists, the admissions of the Club of Rome and the operational blueprints of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), we establish that the scientific consensus is a manufactured illusion. We further expose the technological infrastructure currently being deployed to enforce this new order, from the weather modification capabilities of HAARP and cloud seeding to the biological alteration of the global food supply through RNA technologies and anti-methane vaccines funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

This is not a story of environmental salvation. It is a story of a malevolent, anti-human agenda designed to unite the world against a phantom enemy, thereby subjugating humanity to a system of total control.

I. The Empirical Void: Deconstructing the Science of Alarmism

The foundation of the entire climate change apparatus rests on a single, precarious premise: that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) are driving a catastrophic rise in global temperatures. This premise, propagated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and amplified by a compliant media, disintegrates when subjected to independent scrutiny of the raw data.

1.1 The Atmospheric Reality: A Trace Gas in a Robust System

To comprehend the magnitude of the deception, one must first ground the discussion in physical reality. The Earth’s atmosphere is a robust, complex system dominated by nitrogen and oxygen. Specifically, the atmosphere is constituted of 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen. Argon and other trace gases make up approximately 0.98%. Carbon dioxide, the villain of the globalist narrative, accounts for a mere 0.04% of the atmosphere.

The proposition that humanity’s contribution to this 0.04% {which itself is a fraction of the total natural carbon cycle} possesses the thermodynamic power to destabilize the entire planetary climate system is scientifically tenuous. It requires a belief in high-sensitivity positive feedback loops that empirical observation fails to validate.

1.1.1 The Saturation of the Greenhouse Effect

The physics of the greenhouse effect regarding CO₂ are logarithmic, not linear. This means that as the concentration of the gas increases, its ability to trap additional heat decreases exponentially. Distinguished physicists, including Dr. William Happer and Dr. Richard Lindzen, have demonstrated that at current levels of approximately 420 parts per million (ppm), atmospheric CO₂ is effectively “saturated”.

In simple terms, the “greenhouse window” is already painted black. Adding another coat of paint (more CO₂) does not block significantly more light. The absorption bands for thermal radiation are already blocked. According to the data presented by Happer and Lindzen, a doubling of CO₂ from present levels would result in an imperceptibly small change in global temperature, rendering the multi-trillion-dollar push for “Net Zero” scientifically pointless.

1.2 Satellite Data vs. Computer Models: The 1.5-Degree Reality

The narrative of “boiling oceans” and “runaway warming” exists almost exclusively within the virtual reality of General Circulation Models (GCMs) – computer simulations programmed to predict catastrophe. However, when we look at the actual temperature of the planet, a very different picture emerges.

Professor John Christy, a Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) and a pioneer in satellite thermometry, provides the definitive counter-evidence. Unlike ground-based weather stations, which are often corrupted by the Urban Heat Island effect (where concrete and asphalt retain heat, artificially inflating readings), satellites monitor the bulk atmosphere from the surface up to the stratosphere, providing a true global picture.

Professor Christy’s analysis of this satellite data reveals a warming trend of approximately 1.5 degrees Celsius per century, a rate deemed manageable and placing current temperatures within historical
norms. In his testimony and interviews, Dr. Christy is unequivocal about the implications of this figure:

“We use satellites to monitor the true global temperate of the atmosphere and we find that there’s a rise of about 1.5 degrees per century which is certainly something that is manageable and the earth has seen before. We are about the same as we were 1000 years ago and certainly cooler that we were about 5,000 to 8,000 years ago.”

This statement destroys the “emergency” narrative. If the current temperature is comparable to the Medieval Warm Period (1,000 years ago) and cooler than the Holocene Climatic Optimum (5,000-8,000 years ago), then the current climate state is well within the bounds of natural variability. There is no unprecedented crisis.

NASA’s own Version 6.1 global lower tropospheric temperature anomaly for July 2025 still showed a departure of +0.36°C from the 1991-2020 mean, even if the long-term linear trend remains modest at +0.16°C/decade.

Furthermore, Dr. Christy’s research highlights a systemic failure in the IPCC’s models. He notes that 100% of the climate models used to drive public policy show the planet warming significantly faster than the actual data indicates. The models are “exaggerating what is going on,” effectively creating a fictional planet that is warming twice as fast as the real one.

1.3 The Vital Gas: Carbon Dioxide and Global Greening

Far from being a pollutant that threatens survival, carbon dioxide is the “gas of life.” It is the essential food for plants, the basis of the photosynthetic process that sustains the entire biosphere. The demonization of CO₂ is an inversion of biological reality.

The relationship is simple: the greater the concentration of CO₂, the better plants grow. Higher CO₂ levels allow plants to use water more efficiently, shrinking their stomata (pores) and losing less moisture to transpiration. This allows vegetation to thrive in arid environments where it would otherwise perish.

Empirical evidence confirms this beneficial effect. According to NASA figures, the world has become 14% greener in the last 40 years. This “Global Greening” represents a net increase in leaf area equivalent to two times the size of the continental United States.

Studies attribute 70% of this greening directly to the fertilization effect of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. This phenomenon has likely reduced global warming by 0.2°C to 0.25°C due to the cooling effect of increased vegetation. By framing CO₂ as a threat, the climate agenda effectively targets the very mechanism that is currently increasing global food security and expanding the biosphere.

1.4 The Temporal Paradox: Ice Cores and the Lag Effect

One of the most potent weapons in the alarmist arsenal has been the correlation between CO₂ and temperature observed in ice core records, such as those from Vostok, Antarctica. Al Gore famously used this correlation in An Inconvenient Truth to argue that CO₂ drives temperature. However, he omitted a critical detail that reverses the entire causality of the argument.

Detailed analysis of these ice cores reveals that changes in temperature precede changes in CO₂ concentrations. The lag time is substantial – historically, CO₂ levels rise about 500 to 1,000 years after the temperature starts to rise.

“The greatest controversy of all revolves around readings from ice cores… once the temperature starts to rise, you will see the carbon dioxide rise about 500 to 1000 years after. So the CO₂ actually lags the temperature changes.”

The mechanism for this is the solubility pump of the oceans. As the planet warms (due to solar cycles or orbital mechanics), the oceans – which hold the vast majority of Earth’s carbon – slowly warm up. Warmer water cannot hold as much gas as cold water, so it releases (outgasses) CO₂ into the atmosphere. This process takes centuries. The fact that CO₂ lags temperature proves that it is a response to climate change, not the primary driver of it.

1.5 The Myth of Extreme Weather

The final pillar of the alarmist argument is the alleged increase in extreme weather events—hurricanes, droughts, floods, and tornadoes. This claim is repeated “from the top of the United Nations down,” forming the emotional core of the fear campaign.

However, these claims are “lies based on made up science and illusions of their own.” Professor Christy states categorically that there is no data to support those claims. Statistical analysis of hurricane frequency and intensity, tornado counts, and drought indices shows no significant long-term upward trend that can be distinguished from natural variability.

The perception of increased disaster is a product of the 24-hour news cycle and better reporting technology, not a change in the physical climate. The narrative relies on “attribution science”—a pseudo-scientific method where models are used to claim that a specific weather event was “made more likely” by climate change, despite observational data showing no trend in the events themselves.

1.6 The Corruption of Consensus

If the science is so shaky, why does the public believe there is a 97% consensus? The answer is the systematic silencing of dissent and the corruption of the scientific funding process.

Contrary to the media portrayal of a unified scientific front, almost 2,000 scientists and professionals have signed the World Climate Declaration (CLINTEL), stating unequivocally: “There is no climate emergency”.

This declaration includes Professor John Clauser, the 2022 Nobel Prize winner in Physics. Professor Clauser has publicly denounced the climate narrative, stating:

“The popular narrative about climate science reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world economy and the well-being of billions of people.” These scientists argue that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs rather than sound, self-critical science. They highlight that CO₂ is not a pollutant and that climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities. The fact that a Nobel Laureate in Physics feels compelled to warn of a “corruption of science” suggests that the “consensus” is maintained not by evidence, but by political pressure and the suppression of inconvenient truths.

II. The Architects of the Hoax: Origins of the Narrative

The “Climate Crisis” did not emerge from a sudden discovery of impending doom. It was invented. It is the result of a deliberate, decades-long strategy by a group of global elites to identify a common enemy that would justify the creation of a supranational government.

2.1 The Club of Rome and the “New Enemy”

The ideological roots of the climate hoax lie with the Club of Rome, a shadowy think tank of industrialists, scientists, and bureaucrats founded in 1968. Their mission was to address the “problematique”—the complex of problems facing humanity – but their solution was always the same: the limitation of growth and the centralization of control. The Club of Rome itself is positioned as the intellectual engine room of the entire project, with its foundational documents providing the philosophical justification for dismantling existing economic and political structures

In 1975, the Club of Rome published its second report, Mankind at the Turning Point. This document argued that the world had to move towards an “organic” society – a euphemism for a centrally managed global organism where the parts (nations and individuals) are subservient to the whole.

The intellectual origins of the climate hoax are traced directly to the Club of Rome’s seminal reports. Their 1972 publication, The Limits to Growth, commissioned MIT researchers to model the consequences of exponential economic growth against finite planetary resources. While the specific predictions have been widely debated, the report’s central thesis – that humanity faces an urgent crisis due to its impact on the planet – provided the foundational narrative. This was followed in 1975 byMankind at the Turning Point, which concluded that the solution to the ensuing crises could only be developed in a global context, necessitating a new world economic order and a global resources allocation system – a clear call for
technocracy and top-down control.

The lead quotation from this second report – “The world has cancer and the cancer is man” – is by itself a damning piece of evidence, framing humanity as the problem to be solved.

However, the definitive admission of the hoax came in 1991, with the publication of The First Global Revolution. In a candid discussion on how to unite a divided world in the post-Cold War era, which admits the manufactured nature of the crisis. The quote, found on page 115, states:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill… All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself“.

This passage is the smoking gun. It explicitly identifies “global warming” not as a physical reality they discovered, but as an idea they came up with to fit the bill of a common enemy. The enemy is not carbon; the enemy is humanity. The “threat” was manufactured to justify a war against human expansion, consumption, and freedom.

2.2 Maurice Strong: The Godfather of the Climate Agenda

The man who operationalized this philosophy was Maurice Strong. A Canadian oil tycoon and a close associate of the Rockefeller family, Strong is the single most important figure in the creation of the climate change industry.

Strong was a member of the Club of Rome and a mentor to World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab. He realized that the environmental movement could be leveraged to transform the global economic system. Maurice Strong’s direct involvement with the Club of Rome is well-documented and
serves as a critical link in the conspiracy’s chain of command. He chaired a significant meeting at Founex, Switzerland, in July 1971, which was described by Strong himself as “the most important single event in the run-up to Stockholm”. This meeting produced a foundational synthesis that directly shaped the 1972
Stockholm Declaration and laid the groundwork for what would become Agenda 21.

In 1972, he organized the Stockholm Conference, which established the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Strong became its first Executive Director.

Strong’s genius was in building the institutions that would perpetuate the crisis narrative. In 1988, he was instrumental in establishing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the body responsible for the alarmist reports that drive global policy today. The IPCC is portrayed not as a scientific body but as a mainly political entity that endorsed a thesis by a small group of scientists, locking it into a theory about industrial carbon dioxide driving climate change.

Finally, in 1992, as secretary general of the UN’s Earth Summit in Brazil, Strong presided over the commitment of 179 nations to a world action plan known as Agenda 21, which laid the groundwork for subsequent agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Accord.

Strong’s legacy is the legal and bureaucratic framework of the climate agenda:

• The 1992 Rio Earth Summit: Strong served as Secretary-General. Here, Agenda 21 was unveiled—the blueprint for the 21st century.
• The Kyoto Protocol: A direct result of the frameworks Strong established.
• The Paris Accord: The continuation of the Rio process.
• Agenda 2030: The updated and expanded version of Agenda 21.

Strong was open about his motivations. He believed that the industrialized civilization was unsustainable and had to be dismantled. He used his position at the UN to create the mechanisms – the IPCC, the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – that would ensure this dismantling proceeded under the guise of saving the planet.

The connection between these disparate elements is made explicit through the concept of a continuous ideological lineage. The Club of Rome’s vision of a controlled global society evolved through UNEP, the IPCC, and culminated in the comprehensive governance plans of Agenda 21 and its successor, Agenda 2030. The argument posits that the “climate crisis” was merely the convenient pretext needed to justify such a radical shift in power from nation-states to global institutions. Without this manufactured crisis, the transition to a technocratic, one world government would be impossible to sell to the public.

Therefore, the actions of Strong and the Club of Rome were not simply about environmentalism; they were a calculated move to seize control by inventing a problem that required their unique brand of global management. This reframes every major environmental summit, every IPCC report, and every climate treaty as a step closer to the ultimate goal of eroding national sovereignty and establishing centralized
authority over all aspects of human life. The true purpose of this entire apparatus is not to save the planet, but to control humanity.

III. The Mechanism of Enslavement: Agenda 2030

The ultimate manifestation of Maurice Strong’s vision is Agenda 2030. Adopted by the UN in 2015, it is marketed as a benevolent plan to “end poverty” and “save the planet” through 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In reality, it is a roadmap for the total inventory and control of the planet.

3.1 The Erosion of Self-Determination

The official roadmap for Agenda 2030 confirms its ultimate goal is the erosion of self-determination. By shifting power from sovereign nations to international bodies and unelected technocrats, the agenda effectively dissolves the concept of the nation-state.

The agenda provides the narrative for the action plan to inventory and control:

• All Land: Through zoning laws, conservation easements, and restrictions on private property usage.
• Water: Through the commodification and rationing of water resources.
• Plants and Animals: Through the control of agriculture, biodiversity, and genetic resources.
• Production and Construction: Through strict carbon codes and “sustainability” standards that favor large corporations over small businesses.
• Law Enforcement, Energy, Food, Information: All sectors are to be “harmonized” under global standards.

All of this is achieved under the pretext of “sustainable development.” This term, popularized by the Brundtland Commission (of which Strong was a member), implies a balance between human needs and nature. In practice, it is a tool for rationing resources and restricting development to approved channels. The use of terms like ‘SMART’ (Sustainability Monitoring, Assessing, Rating, and Tracking) reveals the true nature of the beast. ‘Smart’ cities, ‘smart’ meters, and ‘smart’ phones are the nodes of a surveillance grid designed to monitor compliance with the agenda.

IV. The Technocratic Panopticon: Tools of Enforcement

The psychopaths behind this agenda do not rely solely on treaties and agreements. They have developed the technology to enforce their will directly upon the population. The infrastructure for a digital prison is being built around us, justified by the need to track and reduce our carbon footprint.

4.1 The Chinese Social Credit System: The Model

The prototype for the Agenda 2030 society is the Chinese Social Credit System. While Western media portrays this as a foreign dystopia, it is the model for the global system currently being implemented.

In China, the government tracks every aspect of a citizen’s life—financial transactions, internet activity, social interactions, and movements. “Trustworthy” citizens are rewarded, while “untrustworthy” ones are blacklisted. Punishments include:

• Inability to buy plane or train tickets (travel bans).
• Slowed internet speeds.
• Exclusion from high-paying jobs.
• Public shaming.

This system aligns perfectly with the Agenda 2030 goals of “behavior modification.” The infrastructure – digital IDs, facial recognition, and ubiquitous surveillance – is already being rolled out globally.

4.2 Carbon Footprint Trackers and Digital IDs

The mechanism to bring the social credit system to the West is the Carbon Footprint Tracker. The narrative of the climate hoax provides the perfect excuse to track every purchase and movement of every citizen.

Financial institutions and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are developing systems to track the “carbon footprint of bank loans” and individual transactions. Applications are already available that allow users (and banks) to monitor the carbon impact of their spending. The logical conclusion of this technology is the Carbon Passport or personal carbon allowance. Under this system, each citizen would be allotted a maximum amount of carbon they can “emit” per year. Once the limit is reached, their Digital ID would block them from purchasing fuel, meat, or flight tickets. This is the ultimate tool of control: the rationing of life itself based on a fraudulent scientific metric.

4.3 The 15-Minute City: Climate Confinement

At the physical level, the agenda is implemented through the 15-Minute City concept. Ostensibly an urban planning strategy to put essential services within walking distance, it is, in reality, a strategy for climate confinement.

In cities like Oxford, UK, the implementation of “Low Traffic Neighborhoods” (LTNs) has involved the installation of cameras and physical barriers to prevent residents from driving outside their designated zones without a permit. This zoning mirrors the “Hunger Games” style district system, where freedom of movement is restricted to “save the planet.”

The narrative of the 15-Minute City is used to justify the removal of cars, the narrowing of roads, and the surveillance of movement. It is the physical manifestation of the lockdown mentality, made permanent under the guise of climate action.

V. Manipulating the Heavens: Weather Warfare

Perhaps the most terrifying aspect of the climate hoax is the allegation that the “extreme weather” driving the fear is not natural, but engineered. The “psychopaths” behind the agenda have long developed and own the technology to manipulate the weather.

5.1 HAARP: The Ionospheric Heater

The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Gakona, Alaska, is a facility capable of beaming gigawatts of energy into the ionosphere. While officially a research station, its capabilities align with theories of weather warfare.

By heating the ionosphere, HAARP can create artificial plasma irregularities. Critics argue this can lift the ionosphere, altering the path of the jet stream. Since the jet stream steers weather systems, manipulating it allows for the steering of storms, the creation of “heat domes” (persistent high-pressure ridges that cause droughts), or the direction of “atmospheric rivers” to cause floods. The ability to generate ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) waves also raises concerns about tectonic manipulation (earthquakes) and biological effects on human cognition.

5.2 NEXRAD and Directed Energy

NEXRAD (Next-Generation Radar) is a network of Doppler weather radars covering the United States. While their stated purpose is observation, valid physics indicates that radar arrays emit microwave energy.

Conspiracy researchers argue that NEXRAD stations can be pulsed in synchronization to heat specific regions of the atmosphere or manipulate storm fronts. Anomalies appearing on radar maps—such as circular “flashes” or perfect geometric patterns during storms—are cited as evidence of this active manipulation.

5.3 Cloud Seeding: The Texas Case Study

Cloud Seeding is an admitted and widely used technology. It involves dispensing substances like silver iodide or hygroscopic salts into clouds to induce precipitation.

The potential for this technology to be weaponized or used to create “disasters” was highlighted during the devastating floods in Texas in July 2024. It was confirmed that a company called Rainmaker Technology had conducted cloud seeding operations in the region just days before the flooding occurred. While officials denied a connection, the timing raises the distinct possibility that the “extreme weather” blamed on climate change was actually the result of reckless or malicious geoengineering.

5.4 Chemtrails and Geoengineering

The persistent trails left by aircraft, known as chemtrails, are identified by researchers as part of a Solar Radiation Management (SRM) program. This involves spraying heavy metals (aluminum, barium, strontium) into the stratosphere to block sunlight.

While intended ostensibly to “cool the planet,” these particulates poison the soil and water, disrupting natural rainfall patterns and potentially harming human health. This aligns with the Agenda 2030 goal of control: by disrupting natural weather, the cabal creates the chaos necessary to justify their intervention and control over agriculture and water resources.

The incentive for this climate hoax is control. By controlling the weather, you control the food supply. By controlling the food supply, you control the people.

VI. The Biological Siege: The War on Food

The climate narrative has now shifted its crosshairs to the most fundamental human need: food. The “War on Farming” is currently underway, with a specific focus on eliminating livestock and replacing natural protein with corporate-owned, lab-grown alternatives.

6.1 Bill Gates and the Obsession with Cows

Billionaire Bill Gates has recently grown a significant preoccupation with cows. He has become the largest private farmland owner in the US and is a leading voice in the campaign to demonize cattle as a source of methane.

Gates’ solution is to “fix the cow” by vaccinating them or genetically modifying them. He openly advocates for rich nations to switch 100% to synthetic beef. This is not about the environment; it is about monopolizing the global protein supply.

6.2 Poisoning the Food Chain: Rumin8 and Bromoform

The actual intention appears to be to poison you through your food. Gates has invested $12 million into a company called Rumin8, which is developing a feed additive to stop cows from producing methane. The active ingredient in Rumin8’s product mimics the effects of red seaweed, specifically a compound called bromoform. A look at the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for bromoform reveals it is a hazardous chemical. It is classified as:

• Toxic if inhaled.
• Harmful if swallowed.
• Causes serious eye and skin irritation.
• Animal studies indicate effects on the liver, kidney, and central nervous system, and it is a potential carcinogen.

By introducing this toxic compound into the diet of cattle, there is a risk of residues entering the meat and milk supply. The “fix” for the non-existent methane problem involves feeding potential toxins to the animals that feed the world.

6.3 Vaccinating Against Digestion: Arkeabio

Gates is also funding Arkeabio, a company developing a vaccine to reduce methane emissions. This vaccine works by targeting the methanogenic microbes in the cow’s rumen—effectively immunizing the animal against its own digestive process.

This represents a radical, unprecedented intervention in animal biology. The long-term health effects on the animals, and the humans who consume them, are unknown. It turns the animal into a pharmaceutical product, dependent on biotech interventions to “function” according to the climate mandates.

6.4 Terrana Biosciences: RNA Sprays

Perhaps most alarming is the move towards genetic modification of crops via spray. Gates has donated $50 million (via Flagship Pioneering) to a company known as Terrana Biosciences.

Terrana is creating a new category of “biologically modified crops” using RNA technology. Unlike traditional GMOs, which modify the seed, Terrana develops “sprayable RNA” (dsRNA) that enters the plant cells and utilizes the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway to silence specific genes.

These products are described as “programmable plant vaccines”. They can be sprayed on crops to alter their traits, such as drought resistance or pesticide susceptibility, or to kill pests by silencing their essential genes.

The danger lies in the off-target effects. RNA is the “language of life.” Spraying genetic instructions onto food crops raises the specter of these RNA molecules entering the human digestive system and affecting human gene expression. This technology allows for the genetic modification of the food supply without the “GMO” label, bypassing regulatory scrutiny and public awareness.

VII. Manufacturing Consent: The Funding of the Hoax

The appearance of a popular movement demanding climate action is a carefully constructed illusion. The “grassroots” protest groups that disrupt traffic and throw soup on paintings are, in fact, the foot soldiers of the billionaire class.

7.1 The Climate Emergency Fund

Many of these protest groups, such as Just Stop Oil, Extinction Rebellion, and Scientist Rebellion, are backed by organizations such as the Climate Emergency Fund (CEF).

The CEF is financed by billionaires, most notably Aileen Getty, the heiress to the Getty oil fortune. It is a supreme irony that the wealth generated by the oil industry is now funding the radical activists demanding the end of oil. This suggests a coordinated strategy where the elite use their wealth to control the opposition, directing the energy of the youth toward goals that ultimately serve the Agenda 2030 consolidation of power.

Hollywood celebrities like Jeremy Strong (Succession) and Adam McKay (Don’t Look Up) sit on the board or fund the CEF, providing the cultural legitimacy and media amplification necessary to maintain the hysteria.

Conclusion: The Final Stand

The evidence is overwhelming. The “Climate Crisis” is a hoax. It is a narrative constructed by the Club of Rome, operationalized by Maurice Strong and the UN, and enforced by a corrupt scientific establishment and a complicit media.

The science does not support the alarmism. Temperatures are within historical norms, CO₂ is a beneficial trace gas, and extreme weather is not increasing. The “consensus” is a lie maintained by the suppression of dissent.

The true purpose of the hoax is control. It is the satan inspired Agenda 2030, a blueprint for a technocratic totalitarianism where the state owns the land, the water, and the sky. It is a future of Social Credit Systems, Carbon Passports, and 15-Minute Cities. It is a future where the food supply is poisoned with bromoform and genetically altered with RNA sprays.

The “real enemy” identified by the Club of Rome was humanity itself. The war on carbon is a war on life. Recognizing this deception is the only way to preserve human freedom and prevent the descent into a global tyranny disguised as “sustainable development.”

In conclusion, the so-called “climate crisis” is not a scientific consensus but a spiritually deceptive narrative woven into the fabric of the UN’s Agenda 2030—an agenda rooted in humanist globalism that directly opposes biblical truth and God’s ordained order. As believers, we are called to discern the signs of the times and reject falsehoods disguised as progress.

To equip yourself further, we strongly encourage you to read our eye-opening exposés: “What the fuck is Agenda 2030?”, which unpacks the occult-driven origins and endgame of this global initiative, and “The Earth Is Flat and Cannot Be Moved’ Thus Says the Lord: Exposing the Global Lie and Restoring Divine Cosmology”, which restores the Scriptural understanding of creation against the godless cosmology pushed by modern science. Stand firm in the Word—truth is your shield.

References:

1. Global Greening – Climate at a Glance, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-global-greening/
2. How to make sense of data in the climate change debate | Interview …, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://academicinfluence.com/interviews/earth-sciences/john-christy
3. CO2 is making Earth greener—for now – NASA Science, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/co2-is-making-earth-greenerfor-now/
4. accessed on December 6, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/co2-is-making-earth-greenerfor-now/#:~:text=Results%20showed%20that%20carbon%20dioxide,2%20plays%20in%20this%20process.%E2%80%9D
5. Global Green Up Slows Warming – NASA Earth Observatory, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/146296/global-green-up-slows-warming
6. What is the time-lagged correlation between historical $\ce{CO2}$ records from ice cores and global temperature records? – Earth Science Stack Exchange, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/2167/what-is-the-time-lagged-correlation-between-historical-ceco2-records-from-i
7. CO 2 lags temperature rises in ice core data – HyperPhysics, accessed on December 6, 2025, http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/icecore.html
8. The Vostok Ice Core | EARTH 104: Energy, Environment, and our Future, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://courses.ems.psu.edu/earth104/node/1267
9. Shattering climate myths – Sustainability Unlocked, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://sustainabilityunlocked.com/discover/insights/Shattering-Climate-Myths
10. PolitiFact FL: Not all 1.6K signatories of declaration against climate change were scientists, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.wusf.org/environment/2023-10-11/politifact-fl-not-all-1-6k-signatories-declaration-against-climate-change-scientists
11. accessed on December 6, 2025, https://texasimpact.org/trrc-commissioner-christian-offers-testimony/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20Nobel%20Prize%20winner%202022,being%20of%20billions%20of%20people.%E2%80%9D
12. World Climate Declaration 1944 SIGNATORIES, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://modgov.sefton.gov.uk/documents/s125305/Clintel-Declaration_2019.pdf
13. Mankind at the turning point. The second report to the Club of Rome – NLM Locator Plus, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://catalog.nlm.nih.gov/discovery/fulldisplay/alma999835523406676/01NLM_INST:01NLM_INST
14. Mankind at the Turning Point – Club of Rome, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/mankind-at-the-turning-point-1975/
15. Think-tank specializes in the creation of crisis – Maui News, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.mauinews.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/2019/02/think-tank-specializes-in-the-creation-of-crisis/
16. The First Global Revolution – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Global_Revolution
17. Maurice Strong – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Strong
18. Maurice Strong: an appreciation – The World Economic Forum, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2015/11/maurice-strong-an-appreciation/
19. Maurice Strong, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.mauricestrong.net/
20. Misinformation on the 2030 Agenda – Cepei, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://cepei.org/en/documents/misinformation-2030-agenda/
21. About STARS – The Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://stars.aashe.org/about-stars/
22. Social Credit System – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
23. CHINA’S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM – Bertelsmann Stiftung, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/aam/Asia-Book_A_03_China_Social_Credit_System.pdf
24. Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans | Macroeconomic Climate Indicators Dashboard, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://climatedata.imf.org/datasets/596f11fea29d429ba6c5507e3756a751_0/about
25. What are carbon passports? – Institute of Sustainability Studies, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://instituteofsustainabilitystudies.com/insights/lexicon/what-are-carbon-passports/
26. 15-minute city – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15-minute_city
27. Full article: Decoding the 15-Minute City Debate: Conspiracies, Backlash, and Dissent in Planning for Proximity – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01944363.2024.2346596
28. High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
29. Claims that former US military project is being used to manipulate the weather are “nonsense” – RMIT University, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/claims-us-military-project-manipulating-weather-are-nonsense
30. HAARP, weather, natural disasters, and the human mind – CEDMO, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://cedmohub.eu/haarp-weather-natural-disasters-and-the-human-mind/
31. Doppler radar – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_radar
32. Weaponized Weather: When Disasters Become Information Battlegrounds – Logically.ai, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://logically.ai/case-studies/case-study-weaponized-weather-when-disasters-become-information-battlegrounds
33. False claims link cloud seeding to deadly Texas floods, despite “zero evidence” – CBS News, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-floods-cloud-seeding-false-claims/
34. Bill Gates Wrongly Under Fire Over Cow Feed – Newsweek, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/bill-gates-wrongly-under-fire-over-cow-feed-1993358
35. Bill Gates backs new startup aiming to reduce emissions from cow burps – The Guardian, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/24/bill-gates-startup-cow-burps-methane-emissions
36. Seaweed, Cows, and Climate: Bill Gates’ $12 Million Gamble, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://climatefactchecks.org/seaweed-cows-and-climate-bill-gates-12-million-gamble/
37. Bromoform – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/bromoform.pdf
38. • SAFETY DATA SHEET – Sigma-Aldrich, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/sds/aldrich/241032
39. SAFETY DATA SHEET Bromoform – GeoLiquids, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://geoliquids.com/wp-content/uploads/GeoLiquids-Bromoform-SDS-2017.pdf
40. Safety Data Sheet: Bromoform – Chemos GmbH&Co.KG, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.chemos.de/import/data/msds/GB_en/75-25-2-A0003796-GB-en.pdf
41. accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.arkeabio.com/faqs/#:~:text=Is%20the%20vaccine%20safe%3F,%2Dbeing%2C%20or%20the%20ecosystem.
42. Anti-methane Vaccine Could Reduce Impact of Cow Burps – Human Progress, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://humanprogress.org/anti-methane-vaccine-could-reduce-climate-impact-of-cow-burps/
43. Flagship Pioneering Unveils Terrana Biosciences to Deliver Adaptive, Targeted Agricultural Solutions through a Novel RNA Technology Platform, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.flagshippioneering.com/news/press-release/flagship-pioneering-unveils-terrana-biosciences-to-deliver-adaptive-targeted-agricultural-solutions-through-a-novel-rna-technology-platform
44. Flagship Pioneering launches Terrana Biosciences to transform agriculture with RNA-based crop technology – New AG International, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.newaginternational.com/biocontrol/flagship-pioneering-launches-terrana-biosciences-to-transform-agriculture-with-rna-based-crop-technology/
45. Sprayable RNA pesticide works best when potato beetles are small | Cornell Chronicle, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/10/sprayable-rna-pesticide-works-best-when-potato-beetles-are-small
46. Spray-induced gene silencing for crop protection: recent advances and emerging trends, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11882566/
47. Flagship Pioneering’s new RNA-based crop protection company could provide ‘a huge way to deal with climate change’ – AgFunderNews, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://agfundernews.com/flagship-pioneerings-new-rna-based-crop-protection-company-could-provide-a-huge-way-to-deal-with-climate-change
48. Platform, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://www.terranabio.com/platform
49. THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY FUND – The Aileen Getty Foundation, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://aileengettyfoundation.org/the-climate-emergency-fund/
50. Climate Emergency Fund – Wikipedia, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_Emergency_Fund
51. Climate Emergency Fund Backers List Includes Jeremy Strong, Chelsea Handler – Observer, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://observer.com/2023/05/jeremy-strong-stars-climate-emergency-fund/
52. How Hot Is It? – Reason Magazine, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://reason.com/2003/11/19/how-hot-is-it/
53. Evidence and scenarios for global data systems – GOV.UK, accessed on December 6, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f8d9e78d3bf7f499e84dc88/GOS_The_Future_of_Citizen_Data_Systems_Report__2_.pdf